Saturday 3 March 2007

ALLAN KING FILMMAKER: A TRIBUTE

By Rick Jackson

This year's Kingston Canadian Film Festival honours Allan King, one of our pioneering documentary filmmakers. To mark this milestone, director Allison Migneault is bringing back two of his older films with the director himself present at a special workshop. In 2004 King was here to talk about Dying At Grace which was well received. I had the pleasure of talking to him on my show, the Artists and Music of the Twentieth Century on the Saturday during the festival and we had an engaging discussion.

Warrendale (1967) and A Married Couple (1969) are the two older films moviegoers will get a chance to see and I recommend them since they show King's delicate handling about topics close to his heart as a filmmaker or he wouldn't be doing them.

King was born in Vancouver, B.C. in 1930. He majored in Honors Philosophy at the University of British Columbia, drove a taxi for nine months, and went to Europe for one-and-a-half years. Returning to Vancouver, he worked as a production assistant in the television industry for two years before switching to film.

His first short was Skid Row in 1956. After its completion, he left to go to Spain and London. In 1967 he returned to Canada where he concentrated on doing what he loved best - filmmaking.

He was asked to do a feature film about emotionally disturbed children for the CBC series, Document, hosted and executive-produced by Patrick Watson. The documentary which was called Warrendale was never shown because the network executives refused to allow the four-letter words spoken by the disturbed children to be heard.

After the CBC's rejection, Warrendale made it to theatres in 1967 and today it ranks as one of the most powerful documentaries ever made. Having not seen it in many years, it was if I was brought back in time. It is ironic how intense it remains to anyone seeing it today. The children, especially the girls who can articulate better than the boys, brings the same gut reaction as it brings across the revealing, shocking truth of this once-controversial institution outside Toronto.

King wastes no time in introducing the psychodramatic world of Warrendale. We are completely absorbed from the first minute: the anger, the hurt and the therapists who deal with it on a constant basis day after day.

They know what to do and for the five weeks spent filming there for fifteen hours a day, it was an experience.

He told author Martin Knelman in his book, This Is Where We Came In: "They were aware of the camera, but they simply accepted it and trusted us. They all consented to the filming; there were no holdouts. They sensed that we were not judging them."

While watching it, you know these kids are smart right away. It is their physical abilities that handicap them from living in normally. Whether it's the young girl who won't get up in the morning, or one of the older girls who wants desperately to be at home with her mother, it is a revealing closeup at what it's really like to be different.

What is especially compellng is the reaction by all the children when they learn that Dorothy, the cook, has died. It's as if a close member of their family has passed away. They have treated her like their very own mother because she, for them, was the closest thing to being a mother.

The staff, including Terry and Walter, try to reassure them and they all go to the funeral home to see and understand what dying means. The immediacy of the moment is captured on the faces of the children who are relaxed, quiet and fear nothing as they look at their friend. As the casket closes, some do not want to leave. Their feeling of a shared familiarity makes them appear to be "normal" for the first time. To leave means going back to the place where they are reminded of their physical conditions which they have been forcibly learned to accept.

A boy asks, "How did she die?" It is a perfectly normal question which goes unanswered.

It is interesting to see them engage in normal activities, such as watching the hockey game between the Chicago Blackhawks and the Toronto Maple Leafs. Some of the children and staff make a small wager on which team will win.

There are eight dedicated and sensitive staff for twelve children there. A lot of questions were raised at the time Warrendale was first released, such as "Does it exploit the children?" No.

Jan Dawson wrote in the British film monthly, Sight And Sound: "Despite the producers' assurance that when the camera and crew become part of the community, you as the audience are taken into a dramatic human experience."

Documentaries are meant to make you aware of their subjects and to look back at Warrendale is heartbreaking. Today the problem still exists and at other places similar to this one children continue to be ripped away from homes by parents who cannot deal with the special needs of their children.

Ernest Callenbach in his review in Film Quarterly (Winter, 1967-68) took aim at this far-reaching dilemma in society and Warrendale as a refuge for a segment of the population that wants to ignore the quality of life under the pressures of everyday life. The staff and volunteers of places like this are acting as substitute parents to families who cannot cope with the families of disturbed children. How they are born is irrelevant. They are still our children and we must deal with this controversial issue. As you watch places like Warrendale close for lack of financing or governent cutbacks, these children need more than drugs to repress the symptoms in their emotional confinement.

Warrendale addresses and reminds us that we should never let our children live away from home because we want to escape from their reality just because they were born differently.

******************

A Married Couple is concerned about another aspect of society which is more prevalent today than it was in 1969: the high divorce rate. This true story of a marriage in crisis lets us experience up close and personal the problems arising in the average family.

We see it everyday on television if you watch shows like Dr. Phil which tell us how badly we need help. For many of us in a relationship we don't listen, learn or understand each other.

Although King does not give us any clear answers, it is all in the scenes and dialogue if you are listening and watching closely.

His second feature documentary lets us observe the way we communicate to each other by looking at the conflicts in the home of Billy and Antoinette Edwards, their son Bogart and dog Merton.

As we sit back and watch them interact, you can plainly see how easy it is to just
ignore the other person's feelings and end up fighting. Billy, the main provider of the family, has a superior attitude. He feels he doesn't need to do anything at home but sit and relax without being bothered by anything. When he does, he gets irritable, swears a lot and, generally, feels like he is king of the castle. His wife's feelings are ignored, except when the two of them are alone in bed. However, even here it is not a perfect place. You see them argue not only here, but at breakfast and in their living room.

The violence is contained and doesn't get to the point where the police are called in, but some moviegoers may find Billy's coarse language and resentment toward Antoinette to be disturbing. This is not a film for young children to watch.

The reality of A Married Couple is its uncompromising look at ourselves. Married couples who don't get along will identify with the Edwards. Nothing is staged. It is all real. After a few noticeable awkward moments in the beginning when they are sure how to react with the camera rolling, they become themselves.

Billy and Antoinette are caring people who love their home, respect their son and dog. Yet, it isn't long before their conversations are reduced to an inevitable distortion in regard to the other person, which means they fail to connect with true intimacy. Their relationship carries a series of anxieties, childhood patterns and miscellaneous things where the true connection between them is difficult. There are some happy moments shared by them and King captures them, too.

Near the end we get to see and hear Billy's true feelings about their marriage when they have a serious argument and he throws Antoinette out of the house.

A Married Couple, like Warrendale, was the subject of controversy when the Ontario Censor Board felt the language in the film was unprecendented. You have to remember this is 1969. They had trouble deciding if the swearing was going to arouse public reaction and only in Ontario were three cuts made to A Married Couple.

The conversations in the last twenty minutes between Billy and Antoinette reveal the true picture of their relationship. Two years later, they divorced.

Allan King's documentaries deserve to be seen and appreciated for tackling subjects which are both acute and important in understanding ourselves as human beings and the way we show ourselves. The camera, each time, takes it all in for us to play back and, hopefully, we will learn more from the experiences these documentaries continue to teach us.

A Married Couple will be shown at The Screening Room at 9:35 P.M. on Friday, March 9, 2007 and Warrendale at 2:45 P.M., also at The Screening Room, on Saturday, March 10, 2007.

MEMOIRES AFFECTIVES (ALLIANCE/VIVA FILM, 2004)

By Rick Jackson

Directed by Francis Leclerc, Memoires Affectives is a highly charged drama about a veterinarian named Alexander Tourneur who wakes up from a coma only to find he cannot remember anything about his life, including relatives, his business partner and girlfriends.

The screenplay by Leclerc and Marcel Beaulieu focuses on Alexander's plight and his return to some kind of normalcy in what may be a second chance at life, thanks to an accident which almost killed him if it weren't for a stranger who took him to the hospital.

Roy Dupuis, whose screen credits include Jesus of Montreal, Seraphin: Heart of Stone, and The Barbarian Invasions, brings to the screen one of the most convincing portraits of a man determined to live a normal life. As he questions his ex-wife, daughter, business partner and others, he finds them creating memories that aren't true.

Alexander becomes an enigmatic character thanks to Leclerc and Beaulieu who strike a balance between reality and fiction by letting you sort out the truth by leaving out the preordained happy ending from your average Hollywood drama. By gaining your sympathy as he wakes up, they depend on your personal feelings toward Alexander to keep you watching and it works.

Dupuis gives him an inner strength that makes him real enough to be believable, and there are times you sense what might happen next but each time it is a turn only he can make for essentially it is his thoughts and feelings guiding the story as if some otherworldly imaginative force, mysterious and unseen, is controlling him.

From here Alexander learns something he never realized before the accident. This is the truth behind a family tragedy which he faces with his estranged brother in Toronto. It is one of the most emotional and heart-wrenching scenes in the entire film, with it's brutally honest images transcending the imaginaton long enough to be real, for not only Alexander but for us, too.

The music score captures the mood effectively throughout as it underscores the inescapable fear of the unknown as Alexander faces the world from the perspective of a man hurt deep inside and not able to deal with his demons until after his life changing accident.

The cinematography captures the mood perfectly, especially at the very beginning when you see him alone in bed. The isolation is symbolic of the kind of life he had, driven to work by day as a veterinarian, and by night by the bottle as an escape from reality. Each scene thereafter - when he looks at family pictures and drinks alone - he is haunted by the partial memories which come back but make no sense because he never really understood them. The mood in low lighting each time brings home the continued abyss of solitude which still is with him, even at the end when he discovers the truth about his father's death.

No other film at this year's Kingston Canadian Film Festival strikes a sense of desperation and truth through the eyes of personal tragedy from one man. It is almost Bergmanesque in that it examines the heart and soul of a man's suffering.

Only through searching through his past is he able to, at least, have the chance to redeem himself and hope for a decent future, and it is here where the film ends. The last shot of his face hurt and dishevelled by a pain far more greater than the accident that took his memory shows he is on the way to recovery but still a long way to go.

March 7, 2005

Copyright 2005 Rick Jackson

THE TRIPLETS OF BELLEVILLE (ODEON FILMS, 2003)

By Rick Jackson

Written and directed by Sylvain Chomet, The Triplets of Belleville is a marvelous delight from beginning to end. It's retro look has a stunning similarity to Max Fleischer's Betty Boop cartoons which were popular from the late 1920s to 1935 until the Hays Code deemed them immoral.

What immediately draws your attention is the jazz music score. Canadian composer Benoit Charest employed the accordion for the boulevard sequences, while others featured music reminiscent of the late French chanteuse Edith Piaf.

"Belleville Rendez-Vous" is the highlight of the film, and it is performed three times in three different versions. It uses the same rhythm of Django Rhinehardt. The three music hall singers sound like the Andrews Sisters, but it is actually sung by Beatrice Bonifassi whose Attila Marcel is a Piaf clone, Lina Boudreault, and Marie-Lou Gauthier.

Another favourite is "Cabaret D'Ouverture" which has the same dubbed jungle drums and lush melodies and riffs of early Duke Ellington. You'll love the rigourous syncopation, hot trumpet and whomping tuba similar to the Dixieland music of New Orleans.

When you add the campy opera, early rock and other musical incarnations, it's a blending of traditions that make the score a heady mix for the 21st century. After you've adjusted your ears, you are in for a real treat as you watch this bizarre and twisted cartoon take you on an unforgettable journey through its characters drawn in the graphic imagination of Chomet. The kidnap and rescue of a beak-nosed cyclist from the Tour de France was loosely inspired by the real-life kidnapping by Cubist Mafiosi.

The charactres are drawn with such hyperbole and untraditional animation, you are thrown into a subculture far removed from today's computer generated features which pale in comparison.

The Triplets of Belleville features what may be the year's most exciting chase on the big screen this year when grandmother Madame Souza is hot pursuit with her named Bruno. Each sequence is edited so carefully together, it's like your right there with every cliff hanging moment after another. You'll laugh, cheer and, in the end, be thrilled by it all.

It is rated G/General which means everyone can see it.

February 28, 2004

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson

FALLING ANGELS (2003)

By Rick Jackson

Based on the novel by Barbara Gowdy, Falling Angels is an excellent character study of the dysfunctional family. Although it doesn't completely follow her novel and the film itself doesn't explain in detail about the Field family's difficulties, it is still worth watching to catch the performances of Kristin Adams and Monte Gagne who play two of the three Field daughters, Sandy and Norma respectively.

Set in 1969, the screenplay by Esta Spalding could easily fit at any time because of the universality of the overall theme. The mother, Mary Field (Miranda Richardson) sits and stares and most of the time, while the father Jim Field (Callum Keith Rennie) drinks a lot. He does have a job but you never see him working. However, this doesn't matter since the story is really about the Field family at home and how their problems of everyday life have reared their ugly head in a loving household.

The third daughter, Lou, is played by Katherine Isabelle and together with Sandy and Norma, the trio stay together as the sole stabling influence within the family unit.

There are also some intense scenes which resonate with truth and conviction. This nuclear family is not perfect, and you know this right from the start. As you watch the dramatic elements play out, you are absorbed by the three daughters and their concern over their parents. Although you are not fully told the real problem plaguing their mother, you still realize how much she is loved and respected by them.

Similarly, you don't know where the father works but he is able to provide for his family. When he gets drunk and later orders his wife and kids to get in the underground bunker, it is more his concern for their welfare.

Rennie's performance shows two sides to the father as a person. He may appear to be cold and uncaring at times, but during the Christmas sequence you see his real side and experience how his love transcends everything else to become a positive step toward redemption.

Just before the end credits roll, the father and his three daughters are staring at Niagara Falls, which once meant something special to Mrs. Field. They are all sharing in a moment of renewed optimism as they stand together as one family ready to carry on with their lives. The wishes of the three daughters is to live out their dreams; for the fathre it is a chance to return to a once happy and loving home.

Director Scott Smith uses that one last shot at the end to underscore this point for the falling angels of the film's title. It is poignant and lasting.

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson

THE REPUBLIC OF LOVE (SEVILLE PICTURES, 2003)

By Rick Jackson

Anyone looking for a good love story should not miss The Republic of Love. Incurable romantics like Tom and Fay still exist and director Deepa Mehta (Bollywood Hollywood) reaffirms this in her latest effort.

Based on the book by Carol Shields, the screenplay by Mehta and Esta Spalding from a story by Mehta tells you that love at firs sight is nothing to be unafraid or ashamed about. As you watch the two main characters meet and fall head over heels in love, you share in their joy and hope that nothing will change how they feel for each other. As one of the charactres says in the movie, "geography is destiny."

When they both realize they live in the same building and know the same friends, including Tom's two ex-wives, it is a small world indeed.

Bruce Greenwood has played a variety of roles such as John F. Kennedy in Thirteen Days, Ashley Judd's bad husband in Double Jeopardy, the bad guy out to get Harrison Ford in Hollywood Homicide, and the town vigilante who tries to stop Ian Holm in Atom Egoyan's The Sweet Hereafter.

As Tom in Republic of Love, he is host of a late-night call-in show for lonely hearts. Just as he finds love for the first time after three failed marriages, you can see how he has changed from the complex person he was at the beginning, unable to help himself. When love strikes him square in the face, he becomes a new man.

Emilia Fox is wonderful as Fay and she imbues her character with such warmth and fun, you way well be wishing for this to happen to you if you are single.

Watching Tom and Faye is almost a lesson in love. Tom is open to the possibility that love is something great and Greenwood gives him all the room he needs to breathe. When Fay's parents separate, she is so hurt she doesn't understand the mid-life crisis her father is going through. This confuses her to the point of calling off her marriage to Tom because she feels her decision to marry him was too rash.

By the end of the film, Fay realizes how stupid she was in realizing that her welfare is most important to her and no matter how corny and sentimental it may be, love still stands for something. Tom, in turn, wants to forget her, too, but can't forget how much she means to him.

In showing the travails of the love between two people, the director is expressing simply how much love means in a world where everything in it has become so serious.

Like Bollywood Hollywood, the optimism of being in love is something to be held with the strongest beliefs. Having faith in your partner is not a liability but a wonderful experience to keep on sharing for the rest of your life.

In The Republic of Love: love has its ups and downs, love hurts, but love is also eternal. However, without faith, there isn't a chance to be blissfully happy.

It is rated 14A, with the warnings: language may offend and sexual content.

February 28, 2004

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson

Thursday 1 March 2007

DYING AT GRACE (ALLAN KING FILMS, 2003)

By Rick Jackson

Produced and directed by Allan King, Dying At Grace is a documentary focussing on five dying patients in the palliative care ward at the Salvation Army Toronto Grace Health Centre. The families of these five gave their permission to record their loved ones' final days so their experiences would be useful to the living.

As you see each one chronicled, you are reminded that dying can be achieved with dignity and respect. The dialogue is real; everything you see is real. Nothing presented here comes close to any Hollywood production. The intimacy of the camera tells the stories of these five who are treated with the utmost kindness and hospitality by the staff.

You are given a short summary of each patient's condition by the nurse who articulates what is wrong. You empathize with each one of them and, in the process, you are left feeling a deep sense of peace and regret that they each died much too soon. Although the circumstances why each are there are unimportant, it is the one moment of truth when they die you learn to accept.

Anyone who has ever been at the hospital when a relative has died may be very well reminded of the hurt, the pain and the loss. For dying is part of living and when you are struck down by an illness, such as cancer or simply told you are too old,it is the shared knowledge of all five which gives you a greater understanding of your own apprehension about dying. True, each person handles death differently and King shows us this with the utmost respect and wishes to each family.

One of the most important characters in this documentary is Major Phyllis Bobbitt, the chaplain who helps comfort each patient by being their friend. She gets each patient to open up and through a mutual trust able to find out what they are thinking and feeling. Her conversations also give each a chance at peace and hope in their suffering.

The nurses are the supporting cast. They talk to the patients and make sure each of them is comfortable.

The five patients are Joyce Bone, who suffers discomfort through the night and can't sleep because of the pain; Carmela Hardone is on oxygen and is nervous about the family visiting her; Eda Simac is optimistic that she will get better as the most talkative; Richard Pollard, who has lung cancer and hepitatis, and Lloyd Greenway, also on oxygen and talks about death constantly.

It is clear that close family relations each feel a sense of relief when their loved one dies. One relative says, "She will leave in peace."

Before each one dies, you get to see their last breath and it's not anything like you've seen in Hollywood where the person closes their eyes and their hand drops. Here death is as real as it gets.

The sunrises and sunsets you see are symbolic of the beginning and ending of one's life and cinematographer Peter Walker shows the essence of it. For noone should leave this world without knowing the full impact of God's creation.

When Dying At Grace was shown on TV Ontario's The View From Here on February 11, 2004, there was a panel discussion with Allan King and Major Phyllis Abbott. King wanted to make a film that expressed what it was like to die. Now in his early seventies, the Vancouver-born filmmaker doesn't know how long he has left and wanted to address this very real and important issue. Very few people get to see how someone dies and death, in itself, is not something everyone will feel comfortable as a topic of conversation. Dying At Grace treats death with dignity and respect. It shares five experiences which tell what it is like to the very end of one's life in a quiet but powerful manner of speaking. The camera recording each emotion and reaction as it happens.

February 28, 2004

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson

THE STATEMENT (SONY PICTURES CLASSICS, 2003)***

By Rick Jackson

Based on a true story, The Statement is a throwback to the Cold War thrillers of John Le Carre and Graham Greene. Michael Caine stars as Pierre Brossard, a Frenchman who was involved in the execution of Jews in 1944. After the end of World War II, he is wanted as a war criminal. When the story picks up in 1992 in France, you learn he has been living in exile in various Roman Catholic monasteries and safe houses. He has been protected by an inner circle of friends in a Catholic society, one which is dwindling due to the changing political climate within the church itself.

The screenplay by Ronald Harwood (The Pianist), based on a novel by Brian Moore, is inspired by real-life war criminal Paul Touvier, who executed Jewish hostages and was protected by an informal network of right-wing Catholics.

Although based on fact, it focuses on the last years of Brossard as he tries to escape from the clutches of a Jewish group who are bent on killing him for his war crimes.

Some American film critics, like Ebert and Roeper, felt the film was shallow and unconvincing as a historical drama. I strongly disagree. Harwood gives you just enough to hold your interest. The rest of the story you have to listen to carefully to unravel the plot threads.

Flashbacks in black and white tell the story that has haunted Brossard and it precipitates his heart condition. The sequence between him and his ex-wife Nicole (Charlotte Rampling) lets you experience the tension that once filled their lives and the awful result.

Tilda Swinton plays Annemarie Livi, a judge who wants to get at the truth behind Brossard's statement in which he presumably confessed. It all becomes more cloak and dagger like an Alfred Hitchcock film, with the statement serving as a macguffin.

Along the way she joins up with Colonel Roux (Jeremy Northam) who shares the same empathy and concern for Brossard. The two make a great team and there are some close calls as they try to get to him first.

In supporting roles, there are the key higher ups in the French government: Armand Bertier (Alan Bates in his last role) as a close friend of Levi's, David Manenbaum (Matt Craven) who once was an officer who stood beside Brossard in the killings of Jews, and John Neville as a man whose loyalty was once for Brossard but has suddenly changed for political reasons that are unexplained.

Caine gives one of his best performances as a man hiding from his past. You see him play a role that shows him with the same cunning for survival, such as two scenes when he defends himself against two assassins, and the timidity of an old man trying to live out his final years in exile.

Under Jewison's direction, The Statement is an absorbing thriller from beginning to end.

February 21, 2004

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson

THE CORPORATION (MONGREL MEDIA, 2003)

By Rick Jackson

The Corporation is a gripping, absorbing and compelling documentary. It examines the shareholder-owned corporation as a person and asks what kind of person it is, its character, and the consequences (both good and bad) on the environment (i.e. air and water pollution), and how important it is for governments to act since they have the power to deal with the corporations.

As you watch it, many questions are asked, with some left unanswered for you to ponder and discuss with friends afterwards. It is meant to be controversial, informative and still shed some hope in the future of the corporation.

In the film, the definition of a corporation is a family unit working together for a common end. Using archival footage and interviews, it brings together a unique perspective to its subject and, for many who see it, it will be an eye-opener.

Mark Achbar, Jennifer Abbott and Joel Bakan divide it into many chapters identified in red, beginning with the birth of the corporation in 1702 by Thomas Newcomb and how he perceived its purpose to serve the public good. It goes on to mention the impact of the Industrial Revolution when the corporation needed more power.

It's limited liability is discussed in "A Legal Person," while in "Case Histories," it analyzes and formulates corporate activity, and the celebrity representation. The filmmakers use Kathie Lee Gifford's sponsorship of jeans as an example.

The environmental hazards posed by the paper mills that pollute nearby rivers with white foam and the Exxon Valdez oil spill bring you closer to understanding what the corporations have been doing.

Although much of what you see may be nothing new since a lot of it has made the news in both the broadcast and print media, it is still a powerful reminder of the threat the corporations are engendering and how necessary it is for governments to start empowering through legislation the means to prevent further deterioration of the planet's resources. They must held accountable.

From the a historical viewpoint, it shows how the Americans financed Nazi Germany and made a profit with Fanta Orange. It drives home the more pressing point of how important it is for governments to force corporations to act more responsibly when it comes to politics.

In "Mindset," Marc Berry, a competitive intelligence professional, aka "spy," tells how he (and presumably others like him in other companies) have acted as predators.

Another major point raised is how the executives and CEOs at the corporate level do not know or understand what it is they are doing to the environment.

In "Boundary Issues," it goes back to the historical events of the 14th to 16th centuries. Maude Barlow of the Council for Canadians stresses the importance of the survival of the planet. It must be maintained or it will die.

One of the more controversial questions raised is the RGBH or Monsanto that was given to cows which poisoned the milk supply. The potential health risk was not even discussed as the cows' condition worsened with more injections. The cost to the farmers is never brought up, either.

Achbar spent three-and-one-half years putting together the archival footage and interviews, a total of 450 hours, which co-director Abbott pared down to what you see on the big screen. There are many issues and concerns brought to your attention and it is all worth taking in. Don't miss it.

February 14, 2004

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson

THE LAST ROUND: CHUVALO VS ALI (NFB, 2003)

By Rick Jackson

Using archival black and white footage, director Joseph Blasioli captures the one fight George Chuvalo is best remembered and this is his 15 rounds with Muhammed Ali at Maple Leaf Gardens on March 29, 1966. It is an incisive inside look at the politics of the sport and how Chuvalo made a difference.

Written by Stephen Brunt and narrated by musician Colin Linden, it opens and clses with this historic match. In between there is the story of Chuvalo, who wanted to become a boxer after he bought a copy of The Ring, "The Bible of Boxing," in a cigar store on Dundas Street in Toronto. When his mother bought him a pair of boxing gloves as a teenager, his dream was one step further from coming true. The rise to the top of the boxing game was not an easy one for him. At 15 he weighed more than any other kid around - 198 lbs - and for the next three years his excessive workouts made him a key player in the amateur heavyweight division.

On April 23, 1956 he beat Jack Dempsey. In September 1958 he defeated Canadian rival James J. Packer for the heavyweight crown.

As Chuvalo says in this documentary, "I was self confident, and proud of myself in an innocent kind of way."

That same year, he went to Madison Square Gardens in New York where he suffered his first major devastating loss because he didn't listen to his manager's advice. He let not only himself down but his family, and it had a damaging effect on his career as a boxer.

Back in Toronto at Maple Leaf Gardens, there were more bouts with Yvon Durelle in November 1959 and Pete Rademacher in 1960, which were losses attributed more to his inadequate training. Chuvalo decided to go to Detroit and look for a new trainer.

On his 26th birthday (September 12, 1963) he fought his biggest and most vicious fight against Cassius Clay, who later told the press, "He fights like a washerwoman."

At this point, it is 1964 and the focus of the film switches to Clay who changes his name to Muhammad Ali.

From interviews at that time, you see him tell how African Americans have been ignored by the whites. Boxing suddenly becomes fodder in the political arena, while Ali's behaviour begins to strike fear among the boxing officials: the Black Muslims might take control of boxing.

Meanwhile, Chuvalo is seen defeating Doug Jones in October 1964, and losing to Floyd Patterson at Madison Square Gardens in February 1965 in a decison that was a close fight but hailed as a moral victory.

When the subject changes again to Ali, you learn that he used a phantom punch to knock out Sonny Liston in Lewiston in 1965. Chuvalo goes on national TV in Canada to tell the world how strange Liston could go down with such a light blow. He is credited for cleaning up the heavyweight division, and Ali is stripped of his WBA title.

Under the wings of Irving Ungerman, you see Chuvalo triumph as a good boxer. He loses to Ernie Terrell in November 1965 after 15 rounds, but Chuvalo is hailed as a better boxer.

On January 25, 1966 Chuvalo loses to an unheralded fighter named Eduardo Corletti in London, England.

Three months later, after much controversy about Ali coming up to Canada to fight, first with Terrell until he drops out and then with Chuvalo. The boxing officials are allowed by Queen's Park to let the fight between Chuvalo and Ali to go ahead.

A key point about boxing's bad reputation is raised before it happens, including the mounting anger against Ali and the politics behind closed doors by those who wanted to get even with him. They did in 1967 when he refused the draft.

Chuvalo admits that he lost his match with Ali because of unsound judgment. As you will see, it is a fight that he neither won nor lost because he stood his ground; his tenacity and unwillingness to stay the course right up to the last round.

February 7, 2004

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson

LA GRANDE SEDUCTION (ODEON FILMS, 2003)

By Rick Jackson

Directed by Jean-Francois Pouliot, La Grande Seduction (Seducing Doctor Lewis) is a satirical comedy about the continuing decline of small town life. At the 2003 Cannes Film Festival, it was the closing night of the Directors' Fortnight. At the 2004 Sundance Film Festival it received the world cinema dramatic audience award. Nominated for 11 Genie Awards, it won for Allen Smith's cinematography. While watching it, I was reminded of Waking Ned Devine (1999) where two longtime friends of Ned's come up with an outrageous scheme to claim his winning lottery ticket. It's a comic gem and worth renting out. Seducing Doctor Lewis is more an Anglicized title. I prefer "La Grande Seduction," since it describes the movie a lot better.

Written by Ken Scott, it is set in the small town of St. Marie-La Mauderne, which was once a thriving fishing community in Quebec. The fishermen there are now forced to live on welfare; their dignity and pride taken away by progress and government cuts. When a small company considers building a factory there, the inhabitants see an opportunity to restore what has been lost. However, there is a catch: they must have 220 people and, most importantly, a resident doctor.

Raymond Bouchard is perfectly cast as Germain Lesage, who spearheads the campaign to woo Dr. Lewis (David Boutin) to stay on the island after agreeing to a one-month trial.

Germain devises a big plan which includes learning all about him by bugging Lewis' telephone to learn more about him. This information is used to persuade him that the island is the ideal place to live.

How the town rallies together to help Germain makes the entire film one of the funniest I've seen in the last five years. It's quaintness rivals the more serious The Shipping News, shot on locaion in a small town in Newfoundland, while the ensemble cast is equally as hilarious as Nuit de Noces, which played at the Kingston Canadian Film Festival in 2002.

The rest of the inhabitants on the island feature Benoit Briere as Henri, Pierre Collin as Yvon, Lucie Laurier as Eve, and Bruno Blanchet as Steve.

Pouliot maintains a good comic pace from beginning to end and you are guaranteed a belly full of laughs.

It is rated PG/Parental Guidance.

February 7, 2004

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson

8:17 P.M. DARLING STREET (CHRISTAL FILMS, 2003)

By Rick Jackson

Written and directed by Bernard Emond, this is a haunting story of one man's introspective look at his life while waiting for his girlfriend to come back home. Told in flashback, he begins with the accident that saved his life. While driving home in his car he decides to tie a shoelace and ends up crashing into another vehicle driven by a Chinese man. At the very moment of the crash, an explosion demolishes the building he lives in.

Luc Picard gives a strong performance as Gerard, an ex-reporter and member of Alcoholics Anonymous. In a monotone voice, he relates his inner demons and how fate has left him wanderlust for answers about the existence of God and why he should have survived the explosion. When he learns a four-year-old girl had died, he wishes he could have traded places with her. Early in the film, he tells us, "There's something profoundly insulting about owing one's life to an untied shoelace."

Moving back to the same neighbourhood in Hochelaga where he grew up, he is determined to keep looking for those answers. His investigation takes him to Outremont, Maniwaki and Quebec's south shore.

Interspersed throughout the narrative are Gerard's thoughts. Divorced three times and a liar, cheat and a thief, the bottle was his only friend for 25 years. At one moment during his journey of self-discovery he goes on one last binge. He visits Madame Caron (Marika Boies), a disabled woman whose cheating husband died in the fire. Her lack of remorse echoes the mood of the entire film. As he cradles the bottle in the front seat of his car, life becomes meaningless once more as all of his pain goes away with each swallow. The look of contentment on his face resembles a dead man in his casket.

Picard literally puts you in a place where darkness continues to plague his very existence. His inner demons lash out in that one last binge where he says all tacts gets lost once you've taken a few drinks. The next moment you see him getting into trouble with a gang of thugs when he steals some of their antlers.

Emond's latest reminded me of Ingmar Bergman, who has dealt with life and death in The Seventh Seal and Wild Strawberries. The Knight in the former constantly asks questions that are unanswered, while Eberhard Isak Borg, the professor in the latter, is afraid of dying, of ultimately drying up and facing a horrible fate.

Although Gerard in 8:17 P.M. Darling Street is wishing he did die, it is God who is not ready to take him yet. It is He who sees hope in this individual; Gerard, too, accepts what the 12 Steps to recovery has to say about a higher authority. By film's end, he has become a new man ready to live life to the fullest with Angela (Guylaine Tremblay), the woman who cares deeply for him.

Cinematographer Jean-Pierre St. Louis keeps the focus of the film's theme constant throughout by letting you experience Gerard's descent into loneliness and despair with the darkly lit streets and bars. Even his apartment has only one small light which makes it appear bigger than it actually is, to underscore the abyss from which he is trying to escape unwillingly.

The brightness of day at the beach that frames the beginning and end symbolizes his one last chance at redemption.

Augmented by Robert Marcel Lepage's music score, 8:17 P.M. Darling Street is as much absorbing as it is thought provoking. It is also one of the best films at this year's Kingston Canadian Film Festival.

February 7, 2004

Copyright 2004 Rick Jackson